因为看到同事被抬上救护车我被拼多多开除了(Youtube视频)

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Vs8c5fYQlVc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>

发人深省,还有他提到的匿名平台MaiMai。

已邀请:

null 【入门级】 - null

赞同来自: 陀思妥耶夫斯基 ass

这群资本家一个个精神状态都在18世纪19世纪,说到底还是欠缺共产主义的铁拳教育

Jason_Fue 【资深级】 - ExpressVPN, SurfShark user

赞同来自: ass

没啥反省的,拼多多什么样谁不知道,奋斗精神被企业利用成了合理压榨剩余价值的机器。

匿名用户

匿名用户

赞同来自: lesvent

整天主义那个主义有什么用,说到底还是钱的问题,荷兰丹麦冰岛哪个不是资本主义国家?福利待遇有的说吗啊?马克思都说共产主义首先可能会出现在发达的资本主义国家,一天到晚穷的叮当响,拿什么共产? 同样,我们国家整处于这么个阶段。从民族发展和历史进程角度来看压榨你无可厚非,只不过以我们几代人的幸福作为代价罢了。当今中国你我皆是韭菜

larry 【熟练级】 - I'm a network engineer that currently lives in China.

So, I couldn't understand him 100 percent, but from what I've seen, basically he was fired because he took a photo of his fellow coworker getting on an ambulance cause the guy was overworked and he posted that image online? That's actually a breach of contract, If that's indeed the case. Terminating his contract with the company is indeed an appropriate course of action, also I've heard there's a 300 hours/month policy within this company, Well that is indeed not acceptable, but exposing the company isn't the right response at all. There are many other ways of resolving an issue like that, in fact a formal complaint letter to the upper managements would be way more beneficial to him than actually "exposing" the company himself, not only it is a breach of contract but also a violation of privacy of his coworker's.
____________________________________________

所以,我不能百分之百理解他,但从我所看到的情况来看,基本上他被解雇是因为他拍了一张他的同事上救护车的照片,原因是那个人工作过度,他把那张照片发到了网上?这实际上是一种违约行为,如果确实如此,终止他与公司的合同确实是一种适当的行动,而且我听说这家公司内部有300小时/月的政策,嗯,这确实是不可接受的,但揭露公司根本不是正确的反应。像这样的问题还有很多其他的解决方式,其实向上级管理部门发出正式的投诉信比自己真正 "曝光 "公司更有利于他,不仅是违约,也是对同事隐私的侵犯

lewfq 【熟练级】 - transwall

资本的每个毛孔都滴着肮脏的血。

要回复问题请先登录注册